View Full Version : Donald Trump đỏ mặt tía tai v́ bị Hillary đá xoáy
therealrtz
10-05-2016, 04:22
Sau vụ bị phanh phui trốn thuế gần 20 năm qua, tỷ phú Donald Trump đă t́m cách chống chế và lên án luật thuế của Mỹ. Tuy nhiên là người thông minh và thâm thúy, bà Hillary Clinton đă đá xoáy ông Trump khiến ông tức đỏ mặt tía tai: Thiên tài ǵ mà lỗ tỷ USD/năm?
http://intermati.com/forum/attachment.php?attac hmentid=944673&stc=1&d=1475641436
Bà Hillary Clinton phát biểu trong chiến dịch vận động tranh cử ở Akron, Ohio ngày 3/10.
Phát biểu trong một sự kiện vận động tranh cử ở Toledo, Ohio vào chiều 4/10, nữ ứng viên đảng Dân chủ Hillary Clinton thâm thúy đá xoáy ông Trump khi nói về nghi án ứng cử viên đảng Cộng ḥa này không đóng thuế trong gần 2 thập niên.
Trong khi hết lời ca ngợi hàng triệu công dân Mỹ hàng ngày chăm chỉ kiếm tiền và đóng thuế đầy đủ, th́ nữ cựu Ngoại trưởng quay sang chỉ trích đối thủ của ḿnh: “Dường như ông ta không trả bất ḱ khoản thuế nào trong gần 20 năm nay. Ông ta không đóng góp ǵ cho quốc gia… cho các cựu chiến binh, cho quân đội”.
Trước đó, theo tài liệu của tờ New York Times công bố cuối tuần, trong 18 năm qua, ông Trump không phải đóng thuế thu nhập nhờ khoản báo lỗ 916 triệu USD năm 1995, tạo ra mức khấu trừ hợp pháp.
Nói đến quan điểm “không đóng thuế là thông minh” của ông Trump và những lời ca ngợi hết lời “thiên tài” dành cho ông trùm bất động sản, bà Hillary bức xúc: “Đây là câu hỏi của tôi: Thiên tài ǵ mà lỗ 1 tỷ USD/năm? Ông ta lợi dụng sức mạnh, bỡn cợt với hệ thống luật pháp của quốc gia, và đặt lợi ích cá nhân lên trên hết. Ông ta phải là trước nhất và mọi người đều phải ở sau”.
Bên cạnh đó, bà Hillary c̣n chỉ trích ông Trump thất bại trong việc giúp đỡ chính nhân viên của ḿnh, các doanh nghiệp vừa và nhỏ, chủ hợp đồng mà ông ta thuê. “Họ đều bị ảnh hưởng, trong khi ông ta cùng những người trợ lư th́ t́m mọi cách để tiếp tục làm một nhà tỷ phú. Và ông ta lợi dụng mọi mối quan hệ chính trị để thu về hàng trăm triệu USD của chính phủ. Nói cách khác, Trump vơ sạch của cải của nước Mỹ và để mặc chúng ta với tờ hóa đơn thanh toán”.
Therealtz © VietBF
I don't think Hilary's friend Warren Buffet is going to like the fact that she calls billionaires that lost money STUPID... He has lost billions several times (the cost of doing business when you are in that level). Also check Forbes to see the many names of other billionaires that have lost money. This just VERIFIES the fact that Clinton knows NOTHING about finances and obviously is the STUPID one.
Clearly the dementia pills have numbed her brain she got zero clues of basic corporation taxes, insulting Americans with real jobs who are abide to the tax codes , what a deplorable lawless idiot wannabe president...
corumstation
10-05-2016, 06:06
1) The point is not the lost of money but the quantity. Every business assume and attempt to mitigate those loses. From 1990 to 2000, his net worth was estimated anywhere from 500 million to 5 billion by Forbes, Business Insider, The Atlantic, The WSJ and etc ... Even assuming a generous belief in his net worth self proclamation during 1995, an approx. lost of 1 billion is about 1/2 of his worth. There is nothing wrong with losing money ... just make sure you can live without it.
2) Plenty of billionaires have lost money, Warren Buffet is not an exception. At his level (mainly billionaires whose net worth are north of 30+ billions and have a liquidity of 5+ billions) their major advantage is private equity financing. "losing billions and or that losing money is stupid" ... those don't verify anything except for a propensity for an increase in certain risk taking behavior. The Clintons know very well about finance and the inner working of politics and the judicial system. Look at their history from state to post White House esp. look at their banking accts.
3) "she got zero clues of basic corporation taxes"? Hugh, for God sake do basic research before you open your pie hole! Mrs. Clinton, from the 1970s - 1990s, made partner in Rose Law which represented TCBY and Walmart. LMAO ... Mrs. Clinton is an image of what went wrong in corporate America!
4) "insulting Americans with real jobs who are abide to the tax codes"? Would you rather she insult Americans with rosy, fictional jobs! As fictional as Donald history of successful nuptials. As to abiding by the tax code, clearly Donald uses the codes to his advantage ... she and any Americans can do the same. That is the law ... Hoe Hoe Hoe
5) "what a deplorable lawless idiot wannabe president..." ... Hmmm. She hasn't been convicted of any crime while in public office. She hasn't declare any business bankruptcy. Most people would agree is a very shrew and manipulative esquire/politician who knows and uses the system for her benefits.
The STUPID one is not her but you for "using Donald grey matter", next time use the Ronco Hair spray instead of sniffing it!
Được Chồng mách bảo Bà Hillary Clinton thật lắm chiêu.../
[QUOTE=corumstation;3 064795]1) The point is not the lost of money but the quantity. Every business assume and attempt to mitigate those loses. From 1990 to 2000, his net worth was estimated anywhere from 500 million to 5 billion by Forbes, Business Insider, The Atlantic, The WSJ and etc ... Even assuming a generous belief in his net worth self proclamation during 1995, an approx. lost of 1 billion is about 1/2 of his worth. There is nothing wrong with losing money ... just make sure you can live without it.
2) Plenty of billionaires have lost money, Warren Buffet is not an exception. At his level (mainly billionaires whose net worth are north of 30+ billions and have a liquidity of 5+ billions) their major advantage is private equity financing. "losing billions and or that losing money is stupid" ... those don't verify anything except for a propensity for an increase in certain risk taking behavior. The Clintons know very well about finance and the inner working of politics and the judicial system. Look at their history from state to post White House esp. look at their banking accts.
3) "she got zero clues of basic corporation taxes"? Hugh, for God sake do basic research before you open your pie hole! Mrs. Clinton, from the 1970s - 1990s, made partner in Rose Law which represented TCBY and Walmart. LMAO ... Mrs. Clinton is an image of what went wrong in corporate America!
4) "insulting Americans with real jobs who are abide to the tax codes"? Would you rather she insult Americans with rosy, fictional jobs! As fictional as Donald history of successful nuptials. As to abiding by the tax code, clearly Donald uses the codes to his advantage ... she and any Americans can do the same. That is the law ... Hoe Hoe Hoe
5) "what a deplorable lawless idiot wannabe president..." ... Hmmm. She hasn't been convicted of any crime while in public office. She hasn't declare any business bankruptcy. Most people would agree is a very shrew and manipulative esquire/politician who knows and uses the system for her benefits.
The STUPID one is not her but you for "using Donald grey matter", next time use the Ronco Hair spray instead of sniffing it!
[COLOR="DarkRed"]STFU wanker...
"The STUPID one is not her but you" ?? ..even if I were half as smart, I'd still be smarter than you.. pathetic lowlife inbred scum
laughster
10-05-2016, 13:13
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpomdqrYd9g
NpomdqrYd9g
:hafppy::hafppy:
corumstation
10-05-2016, 14:44
"STFU wanker... "The STUPID one is not her but you" ?? ..even if I were half as smart, I'd still be smarter than you.. pathetic lowlife inbred scum" --> SlyGuy
An expected & predictable outburst ... no logic, no defense of claims, no excuse. What more needs to be said ... Hoe Hoe Hoe
"STFU wanker... "The STUPID one is not her but you" ?? ..even if I were half as smart, I'd still be smarter than you.. pathetic lowlife inbred scum" --> SlyGuy
An expected & predictable outburst ... no logic, no defense of claims, no excuse. What more needs to be said ... Hoe Hoe Hoe
You started calling me names and insulting me from the beginning.. Now you wants to come around like I owe you something..What do you want from me you disgusting SOB ??... Get a life... Do you know what life is ? GTF outta here..
"no defense of claims" ?? I don't know what you're talking about ? why would I waste my precious time for it?
corumstation
10-06-2016, 04:26
1) Here are your claims below ...
"I don't think Hilary's friend Warren Buffet is going to like the fact that she calls billionaires that lost money STUPID... He has lost billions several times (the cost of doing business when you are in that level). Also check Forbes to see the many names of other billionaires that have lost money. This just VERIFIES the fact that Clinton knows NOTHING about finances and obviously is the STUPID one.
Clearly the dementia pills have numbed her brain she got zero clues of basic corporation taxes, insulting Americans with real jobs who are abide to the tax codes , what a deplorable lawless idiot wannabe president..."
2) Here is the "An expected & predictable outburst ... no logic, no defense of claims, no excuse. What more needs to be said ... Hoe Hoe Hoe"
3) You insulted yourself ... I only pointed out the obvious genetic flaw!
4) You made statements in regard to the thread. I obviously pointed out your flaws. Never claim you owe me anything! Your delusion is getting ahead of you.
5) If your time is that precious, why are you wasting it? Hmm ... anybody home.
1) Here are your claims below ...
"I don't think Hilary's friend Warren Buffet is going to like the fact that she calls billionaires that lost money STUPID... He has lost billions several times (the cost of doing business when you are in that level). Also check Forbes to see the many names of other billionaires that have lost money. This just VERIFIES the fact that Clinton knows NOTHING about finances and obviously is the STUPID one.
Clearly the dementia pills have numbed her brain she got zero clues of basic corporation taxes, insulting Americans with real jobs who are abide to the tax codes , what a deplorable lawless idiot wannabe president..."
2) Here is the "An expected & predictable outburst ... no logic, no defense of claims, no excuse. What more needs to be said ... Hoe Hoe Hoe"
3) You insulted yourself ... I only pointed out the obvious genetic flaw!
4) You made statements in regard to the thread. I obviously pointed out your flaws. Never claim you owe me anything! Your delusion is getting ahead of you.
5) If your time is that precious, why are you wasting it? Hmm ... anybody home.
"You insulted yourself" ??.. LMAO give me a break..
"before you open your pie hole" ...nice words eh. good, use them and vent out your frustration.
"The STUPID one is not her but you for "using Donald grey matter", next time use the Ronco Hair spray instead of sniffing it! "
You called me stupid.. alright I'll take that as a compliment.. I appreciate your effort on trying to tick me off but if that were true then why do you waste talking to stupid people.Do you feel it's a wise thing?
You act high and mighty, but lose and you're just a loser
You said something and then denied saying it... Ah OK I think it's settled. You're just plain retarded...
Why don't you go play in traffic? Get out of my sight you miserable fag
corumstation
10-06-2016, 19:37
1)""You insulted yourself" ??.. LMAO give me a break" & "You said something and then denied saying it... Ah OK I think it's settled. You're just plain retarded..."
... A) Still don't get it. Your entire inital comment was self incimminating, but it only gets better with your continuing denials and lack of any support to your suppositions.
... B) What did I denied? Again, your delusions are getting ahead of you
2) "You act high and mighty, but lose and you're just a loser"
... A) Is pointing out your baseless claims acting "high and mighty"? I guess only to those who have too much natural AC and or who have inherited that personal genetic disposition. My apology to you then for pointing out the obvious flaws again.
3) "I appreciate your effort on trying to tick me off but if that were true then why do you waste talking to stupid people.Do you feel it's a wise thing?"
... A) Trying to tick you off ... if you believe it, it must be true. Hoe Hoe
... B) Human interaction is a necessity. Baseless claims are ignorance playing out to one's lack of education and or due diligence.
... C) Wise thing? The study of human ... always a wise thing.
Time is precious, AC running ... anybody home?
hoanglan22
10-07-2016, 02:15
Hồi xưa lúc c̣n ở tiểu học .Ông thày nói với HL ...
-sao tṛ dốt thế , học toán mà chỉ biết đếm từ 1 đến 10
-HL trả lời ...dạ thưa thày , lớn lên em sẽ làm trọng tài quyền anh , chỉ cần đếm từ 1 đến 10 thôi ạ ...biết thắng thua liềnhttp://vietbf.com/forum/attachment.php?attac hmentid=945513&stc=1&d=1475806466
- Thày !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thắng Thua online ? ....LMAO....
I don't think it is possible to "win" any form of an argument online. Humans are to proud to admit defeat in their convictions. Feelings of resentment towards the person who changed your thoughts will exist. They, for a brief moment had decided an opinion for you, as you unwillingly accepted. So, even if a person "wins" the "loser" will never 100% accept defeat..
This has been my experience every-time a disagreement has occurred online, there is never a winner.....
I rest my case
corumstation
10-07-2016, 12:36
Demagogue : (conventional definition) is a political leader who tries to get support by making false claims and promises and using arguments based on prejudice and emotion rather than reason
1) play up existing threats and embrace a narrative of victimhood and sow despair
2) mocking, humiliating and denigrating scapegoats is their stock modus operandi
3) often seeking to instill fear by constantly telling their followers they are under mortal threat
4) Hitler, Chavez and Ahmadinejad are examples of worldly demagogues
5) Huey Long, George Wallace and Pat Buchanan are examples of US demagogues
In Trump case, his egotism, hubris and a penchant for violence inevitably will sow his demise and fall from grace.
STOP SPREADING THE FOOL DEMAGOGUERY
Martin Niemöller said it best ....
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out ...
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out ...
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out ...
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me ... and there was no one left to speak for me.
I think she knows KungFu
I wonder who her master is? Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Donnie Yen, or Bruce Lee?
BTW, I am asking both of you guys, "corumstation and SlyGuy" please stop throwing punches at each other! I am hurt and it hurts me more than it hurts you!
laughster
10-07-2016, 13:03
I think she knows KungFu
I wonder who her master is? Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Donnie Yen, or Bruce Lee?
BTW, I am asking both of you guys, "corumstation and SlyGuy" please stop throwing punches at each other! I am hurt and it hurts me more than it hurts you!
haha :eek::eek: please purdy please, stop....
in the name of love
Before you break my heart
Think it over
Think it over
Nghe 2 ngừ chữi mà thấy mệt hà hahaha
http://vietbf.com/forum/attachment.php?attac hmentid=945534&stc=1&d=1475808253
sincity007
10-07-2016, 18:48
nên để giành sức chửi cu Thun, thằng tạp chủng nhiều nick(phương lùn) & đám bưng bô hehehehe
hoanglan22
10-07-2016, 22:10
Thắng Thua online ? ....LMAO....
I don't think it is possible to "win" any form of an argument online. Humans are to proud to admit defeat in their convictions. Feelings of resentment towards the person who changed your thoughts will exist. They, for a brief moment had decided an opinion for you, as you unwillingly accepted. So, even if a person "wins" the "loser" will never 100% accept defeat..
This has been my experience every-time a disagreement has occurred online, there is never a winner.....
I rest my case
NO WINNER:thankyou::han dshake:
HL đứng giữa lănh đạn ....
hoanglan22
10-07-2016, 22:11
Demagogue : (conventional definition) is a political leader who tries to get support by making false claims and promises and using arguments based on prejudice and emotion rather than reason
1) play up existing threats and embrace a narrative of victimhood and sow despair
2) mocking, humiliating and denigrating scapegoats is their stock modus operandi
3) often seeking to instill fear by constantly telling their followers they are under mortal threat
4) Hitler, Chavez and Ahmadinejad are examples of worldly demagogues
5) Huey Long, George Wallace and Pat Buchanan are examples of US demagogues
In Trump case, his egotism, hubris and a penchant for violence inevitably will sow his demise and fall from grace.
STOP SPREADING THE FOOL DEMAGOGUERY
Martin Niemöller said it best ....
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out ...
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out ...
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out ...
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me ... and there was no one left to speak for me.
NO WINNER:thankyou::han dshake:
HL đứng giữa lănh đạn ...
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.