View Single Post
Old 04-12-2017   #8
corumstation
R7 Tuyệt Đỉnh Cao Thủ
 
corumstation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,551
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5,833 Times in 1,025 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Rep Power: 25
corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7
corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7
Default

lacloidi ...

1) At that decision point it came down to simple economics.

---> A flight crew was needed to fly a waiting airplane in KY.
---> Bumping four seated passengers for room was common sense

2) The way it was handled and exacerbated was a PR hell ... pre & post drama on board airplane & by CEO Munoz!

3) When it comes down to it, what is written down in United Airlines contract with its passenger and federal laws will be the merits of this case if it goes to trail. But United Airline (UA) will not risk more bad PR, and from a risk vs. benefits analysis, UA will settle the case!

---> Flight crew can remove passenger if said passenger is a flight risk and or doesn't obey given instructions!

---> Doc should clear 6 figures on this one

---> Personally, his marbles were already jostled ... needs pysc. eval & drugs testings before seeing pt. again!

Last edited by corumstation; 04-12-2017 at 14:56.
corumstation_is_offline   Reply With Quote
Quay về trang chủ Lên đầu Xuống dưới Lên 3000px Xuống 3000px
 
Page generated in 0.04281 seconds with 9 queries