VietBF - View Single Post - USA Kinh Khủng: Google biến toàn bộ điện thoại Huawei thành "cục gạch"
View Single Post
Old 05-20-2019   #13
Ho Chu Tiem
R7 Tuyệt Đỉnh Cao Thủ
 
Ho Chu Tiem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,967
Thanks: 1,984
Thanked 13,139 Times in 6,149 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3581 Post(s)
Rep Power: 32
Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9
Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9Ho Chu Tiem Reputation Uy Tín Level 9
Default

Th́ ra Sumsung cũng có chuận bị trước vụ nầy xảy ra v́ Samsung cũng có thể chung số phận với Huawei , Google t́m cách stop Samsung is growing, thuơng trường như chiến trường, chăng ai hiền hết



Google is growing concerned about Samsung’s dominance of the Android smartphone market, according to the Wall Street Journal. Last year, the Korean electronics giant won nearly 40 (39.6%) percent of the Android device market — far more of other Google partners.

Samsung brings in millions to billions of dollars to Google’s Android coffers every year, so it wields the power to get what it wants. And some Google executives say they worry that if Samsung becomes more powerful, it might follow in the footsteps of Amazon by developing its own version of Android and its own walled garden of mobile content, which would hurt Google’s lucrative mobile ad business.
Ho Chu Tiem_is_offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ho Chu Tiem For This Useful Post:
Gibbs (05-20-2019)
 
Page generated in 0.03563 seconds with 10 queries