Quote:
Originally Posted by corumstation
The ultimate real question may boil down to is it worth while ... financially?
1) DT relationship with D&D Entertainment. Is it a sole proprietorship, corporation, LLC or etc ... The relationship alone can shield its owners and or members from liability financially, but even an LLC protection can be voided under certain actions and or neglect by its partners and board members
2) DT and D&D Entertainment ... how deep are their pockets? Any insurance coverage such as a liability and or an umbrella policy?
3) What did DT know or should have known about MB before, during and after the alleged committed child sexual assualt? And would a prudent person act accordingly knowing what was MB history?
4) What did DT and or D&D Entertainment should have prudently done to safeguard the safety of children, their working environments and even down to the allowable hours for such interview. Was there such a security and or participants' safety/welfare plans in place? Were such plans executed according to its own guidelines. CA State and Federal Laws can differ significantly in their requirements
5) Who, DT and or D&D Entertainment, cosign for MB visit on his US entry work permit application? By cosigning the application, DT and or D&D Entertainment may be entirely liable for any ensuing damages.
Those are just some basic stuff, but if DT and or D&D Entertainment has limited financial, then is it worth while to litigate?
|
I think you've touched all the questions relating to the potential civil case that DT and D&D Entertainment may be facing.
I guess
the attorney of the victim's family would know
how fruitfully the case can be constituted and worth to pursue a litigation against DT and any related parties.
Thanks for your thoughts!